Nigina Abduraimova vs Daria Khomutsianskaya Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 11 Jun at 08:09 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Abduraimova vs D. Khomutsianskaya

UZB
0
Win
Played
0
Win

BLR
0
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Abduraimova 0 - 0 Khomutsianskaya
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Abduraimova | 0 |
| Khomutsianskaya | 0 |
Last 0 H2H Matches:
No past h2h happened.
N. Abduraimova vs D. Khomutsianskaya H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0% (0-0) | Career Total W/L | 0% (0-0) |
| 13 | Titles | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
N. Abduraimova vs D. Khomutsianskaya Match Preview:
- Abduraimova has a slight edge in second serve performance, winning 36.79% of points compared to Khomutsianskaya's 33.6%. Could this difference influence the match outcome? It might, considering the high correlation between second serve performance and match wins.
- Khomutsianskaya surpasses Abduraimova in return game stats, winning 51.98% of points on opponents' second serve compared to Abduraimova's 48.04%. On first serve returns, Khomutsianskaya also leads, claiming 38.89% of points against Abduraimova's 30.99%. This could give Khomutsianskaya a notable edge in this match-up.
- Both players show differing abilities under pressure in saving break points, with Khomutsianskaya slightly more effective, saving 48.74% compared to Abduraimova's 44.58%. This statistic can be crucial for identifying in-game turning points.
- In the last year, Khomutsianskaya has demonstrated a stronger match win percentage at 53.57% against Abduraimova's 30.43%, indicating overall better form and greater consistency.
- The players excel on different surfaces. Abduraimova's best performance is on hard courts, winning 58% of matches, while Khomutsianskaya thrives on clay with a remarkable 79% win rate. Is the surface of this match pivotal? It may very well be, although it isn’t specified here.
- Evaluating overall player level, Abduraimova competes primarily in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K with less success (28.57%), whereas Khomutsianskaya finds more success in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments with a win rate of 57.89%.
- Considering opponent quality, Khomutsianskaya has faced players with a higher average rank (301.04), compared to Abduraimova dealing with a 474.65 average rank.
- If the match extends to a deciding set, Khomutsianskaya's 50% win rate is superior to Abduraimova's 25%, potentially tipping the scales in tightly-contested moments.
- In breakpoint conversion, Khomutsianskaya again holds a slight advantage, converting 36.15% of opportunities compared to Abduraimova's 32.65%.
Editorial Prediction (June 11, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming tennis match between Abduraimova and Khomutsianskaya offers intriguing competitive dynamics. Abduraimova shows decent prowess in second serve performance, which could influence early exchanges critically; however, Khomutsianskaya's superior return game statistics present a strong counterbalance.
While both players display competitive mental resilience, Khomutsianskaya leads in critical areas, like breakpoint conversions and deciding set performances, suggesting better pressure management. This edge might play a vital role during decisive match junctures.
Khomutsianskaya's higher match win percentage over the past year and greater experience competing against more highly-ranked opponents suggest a formidability in maintaining competitive edges. Her advantageous stats in high-pressure moments further enhance her position as the likely match victor.
Considering the comprehensive performance patterns and statistical analyses, Khomutsianskaya seems to hold a slight advantage and is more likely to triumph in this match against Abduraimova.
Nigina Abduraimova vs Daria Khomutsianskaya Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Recent Performance Stats
N. Abduraimova Recent Matches Played
D. Khomutsianskaya Recent Matches Played

N. Abduraimova vs D. Khomutsianskaya Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.92% (378/298) | YTD Win/Loss | 67.72% (107/51) |
| 53.83% (843/723) | Sets Win/Loss | 64.20% (226/126) |
| 51.68% (7492/7004) | Games Win/Loss | 55.24% (1762/1428) |
| 57.54% (248/183) | Hard Win/Loss | 67.44% (87/42) |
| 50.00% (42/42) | Clay Win/Loss | 78.57% (11/3) |
| 54.20% (71/60) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60.00% (9/6) |
| 56.67% (17/13) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 1656 | Aces Total | 259 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 2213 | Total Double Faults | 512 |
| 1:5:48 | Average Match Time | 1:27:36 |
| 574.19 | Average Opponent Rank | 387.31 |
| 61% (19234/31464) | 1st Serve % | 68% (6218/9098) |
| 65% (12513/19234) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (3828/6218) |
| 45% (5494/12230) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (1250/2880) |
| 43% (1679/3876) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (624/1272) |
| 44% (13900/31597) | Return Points Win % | 48% (4512/9371) |
| 30.77% (8/18) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 40.00% (10/15) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 32.84% (22/45) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 59.68% (302/204) | Challenger W/L | 65.52% (57/30) |
| 69.23% (36/16) | Futures W/L | 70.42% (50/21) |
| 56% (371/667) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (104/155) |
| 100% (6/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 42% (65/154) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 66% (21/32) |
| 58% (123/212) | Deciding Set Win % | 62% (23/37) |
| 87% (358/310) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (103/95) |
| 13% (358/48) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (103/8) |
| 21% (317/67) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (55/12) |